Containers and Environments


Each Environment consists of any number of Static and Dynamic Containers, with the restriction that Container names in a single Environment must be unique. However, Containers that belong to different Environments can (and in many cases should) have the same name. Environments are introduced in Combine to relate groups of databases (i.e., Containers) between separate physical SQL server environments. The primary benefit of Environments is that they allow developers, software testers, and DB administrators to pass SQL scripts and code packages between Development, QA, and Production, respectively, while guaranteeing fast deployment on each environment.

For now, consider three Environments, namely the Development (Dev) environment, the Quality Assurance (QA) environment, and the Production environment. In most companies, databases and servers used by developers to write SQL code are separate from the databases and servers used by software engineers in QA, which are also distinct from the databases and servers in production. By using Combine Environments it is now possible to map groups of databases between these physical environments on the basis of their functionality.

The Development environment - Assume that developers write code and test scripts on two SQL servers, namely the DevSvr1 and DevSvr2 servers (see Figure 6). The DevSvr1 server contains the FinanceDev, Web1Dev, and DBAMaint user-databases, whereas the DevSvr2 server contains the Billing, Web2Dev, and DBAMaint user-databases. For the purpose of this example, assume that the schema in the Web1Dev and Web2Dev databases is similar, so that scripts developed for Web1Dev must also be deployed on the Web2Dev database.

Figure 6:  Containers and their target databases in the Development environment.

The QA environment - In the QA environment, assume that three SQL servers are available, namely QASvr1, QASvr2, and QASvr3, as illustrated in Figure 7. When scripts written by developers for the Billing database (in Development) are passed to QA, these scripts must then be deployed on the Billing database on the QASvr2 server. Similarly, scripts composed for the FinanceDev database on the DevSvr1 server are later deployed on the FinanceQA database in the QA environment. In the same manner, code developed on the Web1Dev and Web2Dev databases is then deployed on the Web1QA, Web2QA, Web3QA and Web4QA databases in QA, and the same concept applies to the DBAMaint databases as well.

Figure 7:  Containers and their target databases in the QA environment.

The Production environment - Releases that pass all quality assurance tests are forwarded to production for final deployment. Here, assume that there are four SQL servers: ProdSvr1, ProdSvr2, ProdSvr3, and ProdSvr4 (see Figure 8). In production, scripts developed for the Billing database are deployed on the Billing database on the ProdSvr4 server; scripts written for the FinanceDev database are now executed on the Finance1Prod and Finance2Prod databases, whereas all Web scripts are now run on five production databases, namely Web1Prod, Web2Prod, Web3Prod, Web4Prod, and Web5Prod. The same idea is followed by the DBAMaint databases.

Figure 8:  Containers and their target databases in the Production environment.

To summarize, the following figure describes the flow of code deployment between Dev, QA, and Production, where each color denotes the appropriate group of target databases (i.e., Containers) across all Environments.

Figure 9:  Database groups and the flow of code releases between the Dev, QA, and Production environments.

© 2001-2017 JNetDirect, Inc. All Rights Reserved.